Wang Yu;Xu Changtai
2010, 30(10): 23-25.
Objective:This article was to take new evaluation on the part of Chinese Academy of Sciences(n=30)to personal performance evaluation, explored H index and total cited frequency, and the average citation quantity of the relationship between scientists, to study the metrology related topics.Methods:This paper used Web of Science databases which developed with American Thomson Scientific Corporation, by"author"and"address"the search channel retrieves Chinese Academy of Science partial academician separately the article which published during 2000-2009, based on this calculated each academician's H index, will carry on statistics analysis finally.Results:In 30 academicians, there were the H index of 2~31, median 11;the total cited frequency of 11~5693, median 415;the average citation quantity of 1.38~16.89, median 4.56.There were seven members of H index reached Hirsch's standard, or"If you are engaged in research work 20 years later, H index can reach 20, will be able to count on is a successful scientist"in the 30 samples.Conclusion:The data showed that the H index with total cited frequency and average citation quantity to have certain relevance.But overall, researchers in China and the world famous scientists still have the disparity for H index.Quotation frequency and the whole level of scientific research were to restrict Chinese scientists H index.